<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: swf Image Replacement (swfIR)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.steventew.co.uk/web-technologies/flash/swf-image-replacment-swfir/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.steventew.co.uk/web-technologies/flash/swf-image-replacment-swfir/</link>
	<description>Web Design. Web Production.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven Tew</title>
		<link>http://blog.steventew.co.uk/web-technologies/flash/swf-image-replacment-swfir/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Tew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 08:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steventew.co.uk/web-technologies/flash/swf-image-replacment-swfir/#comment-39</guid>
		<description>Hmmm - I can see it now.... site upon site upon site all with exactly the same image embelishments. I wonder if the effects can be easily customised.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm - I can see it now&#8230;. site upon site upon site all with exactly the same image embelishments. I wonder if the effects can be easily customised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blog.steventew.co.uk/web-technologies/flash/swf-image-replacment-swfir/#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.steventew.co.uk/web-technologies/flash/swf-image-replacment-swfir/#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I guess this is a natural extension of sIFR. Could be interesting but fear it may be used for unnecessary eye candy.
At least with the sIFR it's addressing the very real restriction of typographic choice when it comes to basic system fonts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess this is a natural extension of sIFR. Could be interesting but fear it may be used for unnecessary eye candy.<br />
At least with the sIFR it&#8217;s addressing the very real restriction of typographic choice when it comes to basic system fonts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
